Picture a church of 140 on a Sunday afternoon. The service is over, the building is emptying, and one longtime volunteer carries the offering bags to a back office to count them, the way she has for eleven years. Everyone trusts her. Nobody has ever checked her count against the deposit. Nothing is wrong, as far as anyone knows, and that is exactly the problem.
Good church internal controls are not an accusation. They are a way of handling God’s money so that no single person ever carries the weight, or the temptation, alone. This piece walks through the controls that matter most for the offering, the point where cash and checks first enter the church’s hands. It pairs well with the financial oversight questions in our elder meeting agenda.
Why every church needs internal controls
Most pastors believe financial misconduct happens somewhere else. The data says otherwise. In a nationwide Church Law & Tax survey of more than 700 church leaders, nearly one-third said they serve in congregations that have experienced some form of financial misconduct.1 Two-thirds of the respondents who were not aware of fraud in their own church said it was unlikely or would “never” happen there.
That 30% figure is the one that should get a pastor’s attention. Stolen contributions are, by definition, offering money: cash in the plate, checks in the box, and gifts that never make it to the deposit. It is also the area where a few simple practices close most of the gap.
The two-person rule from the plate to the bank
The core control is simple: two unrelated people are with the offering at every step, from the moment it is collected until it is counted, recorded, and locked up or deposited. Not a husband and wife. Not a parent and adult child. Not the pastor and one volunteer who reports to the pastor.
The same survey found 83% of church leaders say their church already has two unrelated people work together on financial tasks.1 That is encouraging, but “we usually have two people” is not the same as a rule that holds on the Sunday when one counter is sick. Write it down. If only one counter is available, the offering goes straight into a locked drop safe until two people can count it together.
Here is what that looks like in practice:
- Collection. Ushers bring the offering directly to a designated spot. It is never left unattended on a table or in an unlocked office.
- Counting. Two unrelated counters, in a room with the door open or a window, count everything together.
- Count sheet. Both counters record cash and checks by category on a prenumbered count sheet, then both sign it.
- Securing. The money goes into a tamper-evident bag or locked safe the same day. The count sheet travels separately from the money.
- Deposit. The deposit is made promptly, ideally the next business day, by someone who did not count.
Separate the counting from the books
The second control is separation of duties. The people who count the offering should not be the same people who record individual contributions, write checks, or reconcile the bank account. When one person does all of those jobs, an error or a theft can be hidden in the records that are supposed to catch it.
In a small church this can feel impossible. You may have one treasurer and a handful of volunteers. Start with the most important split: whoever reconciles the bank statement each month should not be someone who counts or deposits money. Have that person compare the signed count sheets to the deposits on the statement. If the numbers match week after week, everyone can rest easy. If they do not, you will know within a month instead of within a decade.
Controls are not a statement that you distrust your people. They are how you make sure no one ever has to be trusted alone.
Rotate counters and require time away
Long tenure is not a safeguard. It can be the opposite. Church Law & Tax reported that the largest losses tend to involve perpetrators with long tenures at their churches, and the same article quotes accountant Michael Batts noting that nearly half of the fraud schemes found were detected because another employee performed the person’s duties.1
That points to two habits every church can adopt:
- Rotate counting teams. Build a schedule with several pairs who serve on different Sundays. No pair should count together every week for years.
- Require time away. Anyone with financial duties, staff or volunteer, should step away for at least a week or two each year while someone else does the job. A process that only works when one person is present is a process no one can check.
Make giving harder to divert
A few practical changes reduce how much loose cash exists in the first place:
- Encourage online and recurring giving. Electronic gifts go straight to the bank with a record attached.
- Use offering envelopes for cash gifts. Givers can write their name and amount, which gives the counters something to match.
- Send contribution statements. Regular statements let givers spot a missing gift. A member who gave $500 and sees $300 on their statement will ask, and that question is itself a control.
- Stamp checks immediately. Endorse every check “For deposit only” with the church’s account during the count.
The pastor’s role is to insist, not to count
Senior pastors should not count the offering, sign the deposit, or hold the only key to the safe. This is not because pastors are less trustworthy. It is because the pastor’s reputation is one of the church’s most valuable assets, and a process that never puts the pastor alone with the money protects it.
Paul modeled this when he handled the collection for the Jerusalem church. He traveled with others chosen by the churches so that “no one should blame us about this generous gift,” aiming at what is honorable “not only in the Lord’s sight but also in the sight of man” (2 Corinthians 8:20 to 21, ESV). He did not ask the churches to simply trust him. He built a process that made trust easy.
The pastor’s job is to make sure the process exists, is written down, and is followed. Ask to see it. Ask how it worked last month. Bring it to the board once a year. That is leadership, and it is a gift to the people who handle the offering every week.
A simple standard for the next month
You do not need an audit firm to start. Within the next month, every church can have three things in place: two unrelated people with the offering at every step, a signed count sheet that someone else compares to the bank statement, and a rotation so no one person carries the role indefinitely.
Those three practices will not prevent every problem. They will make most problems small and short-lived, and they will let your volunteers serve with clean hands and a clear conscience. That is what faithful stewardship looks like on an ordinary Sunday afternoon. If you want a wider read on how your church’s systems are holding up, the Church Health Pulse is a quick place to start, and more pieces for senior leaders live on the senior pastors desk.
Footnotes
-
Matthew Branaugh, “Every Church Is at Risk for Fraud. Here’s Why,” Church Law & Tax, last reviewed May 13, 2025. Nationwide survey of more than 700 church leaders. https://www.churchlawandtax.com/manage-finances/internal-controls/every-church-is-at-risk-for-fraud-heres-why/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3
Three moves you can make this week
- Make sure no one counts or carries the offering alone this Sunday, including the pastor.
- Ask your treasurer to show you last month's count sheets next to the bank deposit records and confirm they match.
- Put a written counting procedure on the agenda for your next board or finance meeting.
Key takeaways
- Church fraud is common enough that every church should plan for it, whatever its size.
- Two unrelated people should be with the offering from the moment it is collected until it is counted and secured.
- The person who counts should not be the person who records contributions or reconciles the bank account.
- Controls protect honest volunteers as much as they protect the money.
- Rotating counters and requiring time away from financial duties is how most problems get found.